Poll

What age where you diagnosed with breast cancer?

User login

Dose-Dense Chemotherapy Increases Breast Cancer Survival Rates

Share |
Dose-dense chemotherapy can improve your chances of surviving breast cancer

Chemotherapy has become one of the three standard types of treatment for breast cancer, along with surgery and radiation. Chemotherapy is used in one of two different ways: either as a neoadjuvant treatment, meaning it is administered before the surgical removal of a cancerous tumor, to help shrink it or as an adjuvant therapy, which means it is administered after surgery to kill any remaining cancer cells and help preclude future recurrence of the disease.

The White Blood Cell Problem
The standard chemotherapy treatment uses three drugs - doxorubicin (A), paclitaxel (T), and cyclophosphamide (C) - which are administered one by one in sequence. Because of the toxic effects of these chemicals on the body, it is not possible to administer them too quickly. One of the primary problems is the tendency they have to drive down the body’s white blood cell count. White blood cells are the soldiers of the immune system, the front-line warriors that allow the immune system to fight off invasion from bacteria, fungus or virus. In this case, the war metaphors really are appropriate, because these microscopic entities can do major damage to the body if they are able to infiltrate its defenses.

In order to give the body time to recover from their effects, these three chemicals were always administered to breast cancer patients at three-week intervals. However, it was long theorized that the negative effects of chemotherapy on cancer cells could be enhanced if the concentrations of these chemical cancer killers could be increased. But the problem of white blood cell reduction can become critical if chemotherapeutic concentrations are too high. When white blood cell counts fall too low, a condition called neutropenia can set in. When things get to this stage, the immune system is so compromised it can no longer fight off micro-invaders, and the body becomes extremely vulnerable to potentially life-threatening infections.

Dense Dose Therapy Provides an Answer
For some breast cancers, dense dose therapy has provided the answer to this conundrum. In dose dense therapy, concentrations of A,T and C are increased by shortening the time span between the sequential doses from three weeks to two weeks. In order to prevent the onset of neutropenia, patients are given an injection of one of two closely related drugs. Neopogen and Neulasta are made of a natural protein that acts as a growth factor, stimulating production of white blood cells in a way that usually prevents neutropenia from developing. Neulasta has been modified with an additive that makes it stay in the system longer than Neupogen. Because of this alteration, Neulasta can be administered in fewer doses than Neupogen, and its added potency has generally made it the drug of choice for dose dense therapy.

Dense dose therapy has been shown to modestly improve survival rates for breast cancer victims. Detailed information can be hard to come by, but one early study from 2002 found three year survival rates were 2% higher, and four year rates 7% higher, for dense dose therapy in comparison to A, T and C chemotherapy delivered in the usual three week intervals.

Because the threat of neutropenia is so high, Neulasta and Neopogen are not considered optional with dense dose therapy. Neulasta may be the drug of choice for oncologists but for patients this drug has been a mixed blessing to say the least. Both of these drugs must be injected directly into the bone marrow to work, and this frequently causes intense, mind-numbing pain for those who are injected with Neulasta. Bad experiences with this drug leads some patients to switch to Neopogen, which requires more frequent shots but does not generally cause the same level of pain as Neulasta. Another drawback of Neulasta is that it is incredibly expensive for anyone who is not fully insured, as a single shot of the drug can cost anywhere from $3,000 to $7,000, depending on the provider.

Even after taking Neulasta, as many as 10% may still end up developing neutropenia. Dense dose therapy is generally prescribed as an adjuvant treatment for women who developed cancers after being classified in a high risk category, since these women are considered to have more than the usual risk for future recurrence of the disease. It works best for cancers that are estrogen-receptor negative, which means it is not really an appropriate treatment for the 60% of cancers that are estrogen-receptor positive.

Weighing the Pros and Cons
While it may be true that dense dose therapy improves survival odds by a small amount, the pain suffered by those who have to take the Neulasta shots in particular is considerable, and should be taken into account. It may be possible in some cases to try the traditional chemotherapeutic approach, and then take Neulasta or Neopogen injections if your white blood cell count begins to drop dangerously low. However, the best pre-emptive approach to avoiding the risk of neutropenia in certain cancers certainly appears to be dense dose therapy plus Neulasta.

Before making a final decision, any woman with a cancer that could respond to dense dose therapy has to have a good conversation with her oncologist, to make absolutely sure they are prepared to take on whatever risks or side effects might accompany any treatment path they choose to embark upon.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.